Skip to main content
Publications

Prevent Failure By Understanding Why Plastic Parts Crack

This article originally appeared in Plastics Engineering Magazine – April 2017

A variety of factors can contribute to or cause part failure, but understanding the causes can minimize the risks.

Material failures have an overall economic cost of billions of dollars annually, and can have a devastating effect on a product or even an entire company. While the precise definition of failure can be somewhat elusive, a good working description is “a component or process that is not working the way it was intended.” Failure is not always catastrophic, but it can be detrimental and have wide-reaching negative implications.

Certainly, manufacturers attempt to avoid failure, but often unanticipated factors result in unexpected problems. The chances for a successful application can be significantly increased through preventative measures, including appropriate material selection, proper mold design and process development through simulation, chemical compatibility screening, environmental testing, and a variety of mechanical evaluations. Failure, regardless of the type, occurs when a portion of the stress distribution exceeds the lower tail of the strength attribution. In many cases, a relatively large safety margin is thought to be in place. However, unanticipated factors produce a shift of either the stress or strain distributions that results in premature, unexpected failure.

Plastic part stress and strength distributions as designed

Actual strength and stress distributions for a plastic part

Schematic representation of the anticipated safety margin and the actual overlap of applied stress and part strength of the product while in service. The change is often due to unanticipated factors that result in failure.

Multiple factors affect the performance of plastic components, including material, design, processing, installation, and service conditions. These factors do not act independently, and in most cases failure within plastic components is associated with multiple causes. This article addresses five of the most common contributing causes of plastic part failure, in the author’s experience.

  • Ignoring the Effects of Time
  • Chemical Contact in Service
  • Molecular Degradation
  • Impact Loading
  • Designs with Sharp Corners

Download the PDF of the original article

Jeffrey A. Jansen

Jeffrey A. Jansen is the Engineering Manager and a Partner at The Madison Group. He was elected as a Fellow of the Society by the Society of Plastics Engineers. Jeff is a proven plastic professional with more than 30 years of experience solving problems and addressing opportunities related to polymeric materials. He specializes in failure analysis, material identification and selection, as well as compatibility, aging, and lifetime prediction studies for thermoplastic materials. Jeff has performed over 5,000 investigations, both for industrial clients and as a part of litigation. He regularly presents seminars and webinars, covering a wide range of topics related to plastics failure, material performance, testing, and polymer technology. Jeff is a graduate of Carroll College and the Milwaukee School of Engineering.